I was listening to the Michael Smerconish Program where the main guest was Dr. Richard Dawkins. He was hawking his new book.
Dr. Dawkins is one of what I call the Bishops of Atheism, people spreading the gospel of non-god. To him anyone who believes in God is delusional.
He claims to follow The Golden Rule. You try going up to your neighbor and tell him his entire belief system is warped, there is something wrong with him upstairs, and expect him to say, “Have a nice day, Joe”. Yeah, and he's calling ME delusional.
He has no problem throwing billions of us under the bus. Yes, I said BILLIONS of us. A Billion Roman Catholics here ( not including at least a half BILLION combined Eastern Rite Orthodoxies plus Protestant plus Evangelical churches), a BILLION Muslims over there, a BILLION Hindus hiding in the sub-continent; that is a pretty big darn bus. I haven’t included all those who believe in God, but are not part of a formal religion, or one of the ones enumerated here, or have rejected the concept of religion and still have faith in God.
I guess it is good we are self contained on this planet. Maybe since we are all so delusional, it may be better for him to place himself in some sort of institution, isolated for his own protection.
Aside from being extremely arrogant, he is wrong on his premises.
It is understood just having overwhelming numbers doesn’t make a position or proposition correct. You need some basis from which to operate. I know, I will use logic!
Logic is the tool that the Bishops of Atheism use. It is their Genesis to the Fundamental Evangelicals. You cannot assail logic; we all know logic is all powerful. It is what can be used to eliminate the existence of God! I think Douglas Adams had some thing go poof in an exposion of a logical bomb somewhere in the Hitchhiker Series.
Here’s a little secret I learned from 2 semesters of logic taught by a guy named Dr. Wisdom (no lie, I couldn’t make that one up) at Temple University in the 80’s. Logic has limits. It is called a tautology. (I misspoke here and have been corrected by Neal Jansons. I should have said paradox.) It is a breakdown in the logical system. You can also check a book called called Godel, Escher, Bach for a different take on this. It is best to demonstrate.
I have 2 statements, you tell me what the result is and I will have a counter argument to you.
1 – This statement is true.
2 – The previous statement is false.
After you twist you logic around for a while you realize that logic is a tool. Just like a hammer or a wrench. You can’t use a flathead screwdriver on a Philips head screw; it is just not the right tool.
If you are going to call me delusional for my belief in God, whatever His or Her form would be; then you better come at me with a pretty big tool.
Sorry champ, your tool just ain’t big enough or consistent enough to move me off my belief in God.
The Bishops of Atheism are very good practitioners of Sophistry.
My point is I cannot prove the existence of God using pure logic (nor do I wish to). But neither can you disprove the existence either. We are at a stalemate.
Here is Pascal’s bet. Two statements:
I believe in God.
There is a God.
Either can be true or false.
If I believe in God and there is a God, I should be in good shape when I pass on.
If I believe in God and there is no God, I’ll have lived a good life, but no harm, no foul when I pass on.
If I don’t believe in God and there is no God, I’ll have a “whatever” life, it means nothing when I pass on.
If I don’t believe in God and there is a God, I may have a slight problem when I hook up with Him/Her when I pass on.
That is why I look at The Bishops of Atheism as very wise fools.